Import & Export Procedure Case Laws — Sections 46, 47 & 50 Rulings

97 court rulings on Import & Export Procedure under Customs (Sections 46, 47 & 50) — sourced from Supreme Court, High Courts, CESTAT, AAR and AAAR.

97
Case Laws
3
Sections Covered
Time of Supply of Goods under GST (Section 12) Input Tax Credit — Eligibility & Conditions (Section 16) GST Refund — Procedure & Conditions (Section 54)
Karnataka High Court2025WRIT PETITION NO. 108748

Karibasappa Durgappa Hadagali vs The Additional Commissioner on 24 November, 2025

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in *Karibasappa Durgappa Hadagali vs The Additional Commissioner*. *** ### **Judgment Summary** **1. Outcome** The Writ Petition was allowed in part. The High Court quashed the...

The precedent established that mistakes like... Applying the principle of judicial consistency, the... Consequently, the Court quashed the impugned orders...
Patna High Court2025No.470 of 2024

M/S Bathla Telectech Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2025

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in M/S Bathla Telectech Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar. *** ### **Judgment Summary** **Case Title:** M/S Bathla Telectech Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar & Others (Lead case: M/s Utkrisht...

**Non-Application of Mind by Authorities:** The... **Distinguishing Precedents:** The Court agreed...
Patna High Court2025No.470 of 2024

M/S Bathla Teletech Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2025

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in *M/S Bathla Teletech Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Bihar*. *** ### **Judgment Summary** **Case:** M/S Bathla Teletech Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Bihar (Lead Case: M/s Utkrisht Trade Solutions...

It emphasized the **Explanation to Section 16(2)(b)... The Court noted that the GST law marks a departure... The authorities below failed to apply their minds...
Patna High Court2025No.470 of 2024

M/S Bathla Teletech Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2025

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in M/S Bathla Teletech Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar. This judgment addresses a group of similar writ petitions, with CWJC No. 17914 of 2023 (M/s Utkrisht Trade Solutions Pvt. Ltd.)...

It clarified that the Explanation to Section... The Court observed that physical possession is not... The authorities failed to apply their minds to the...
Patna High Court2025No.470 of 2024

M/S Bathla Teletech Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2025

Of course. Here is a summary of the judgment as requested. *** ### **Judgment Summary: M/S Bathla Teletech Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar** **Date of Judgment:** 11 April, 2025 **Bench:** Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha **Lead...

The **Explanation to Section 16(2)(b)** is clear... The Court found that the tax authorities had erred... While upholding the assessee's interpretation, the...
Patna High Court2025No.470 of 2024

M/S Consulting Rooms Private Limited vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2025

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment. *** ### **Judgment Summary: M/s Utkrisht Trade Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Others (Lead Case)** *Note: The court heard a batch of petitions, with the facts and...

**Deemed Receipt is Statutorily Recognized:** The... **Departure from Previous Tax Regimes:** The Court... **Burden of Proof:** While the dealer is deemed to...
Allahabad High Court2025No. 1082 of 2022

M/S Dee Control And Electric Private Ltd vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 And ... on 7 January, 2025

Here is a summary of the judgment: --- **1. Outcome** The writ petition filed by M/S Dee Control And Electric Private Ltd is **allowed**. The impugned order dated 27.02.2024 (passed in appeal), the original order dated 05.04.2019, and the notice dated 15.12.2018, all...

Furthermore, referencing *M/s Maa Mahamaya Alloys... It clarified that liability to pay tax under... For Section 130(1)(iv) to apply, there must be a...
Allahabad High Court2025No. 1278 of 2024

M/S J.T.Steel Traders vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 28 July, 2025

As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a summary of the judgment: **1. Outcome** The writ petition was allowed. The impugned order dated 09.01.2020 passed by the Deputy Commissioner and the appellate order dated 31.05.2022 passed by the Additional Commissioner were...

Regarding Section 130(1)(iv), the Court found it... **Valuation by eye estimation:** While not the...
Allahabad High Court2025No. 1082 of 2022

M/S Janta Machine Tools vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 22 May, 2025

Here is a summary of the judgment from the perspective of a Senior GST Legal Analyst: --- **1. Outcome** The writ petition was allowed. The impugned orders dated 16.05.2024 (appellate) and 26.09.2022 (original) were quashed. The Court directed that any amount deposited by...

***M/s Shree Om Steels Vs. Additional Commissioner... Section 35(6) of the CGST Act empowers the proper... Therefore, even if unaccounted goods are "deemed to...
Allahabad High Court2025No. 1278 of 2024

M/S Magma Industries vs Additional Commissioner Grade 2 And 2 ... on 28 July, 2025

Here's a summary of the judgment: **1. Outcome** The writ petition was allowed. The impugned orders dated 31.05.2022 (passed by Additional Commissioner) and 20.07.2021 (passed by Deputy Commissioner) were quashed, as they could not be sustained in the eyes of law. **2. Core...

Specifically addressed Section 130(1)(ii) and (iv),... Section 130(1)(ii) is inapplicable because the... Section 130(1)(iv) requires the establishment of an...
Karnataka High Court2025WRIT PETITION NO. 27259

M/S Merck Life Science Private Limited vs The Union Of India on 7 November, 2025

**1. Outcome** The High Court allowed the petitions, setting aside the impugned orders passed by Respondent No.3 (Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes). It held that the taxpayer's refund applications/claims were **not barred by limitation**. The matters were remitted back...

Section 54 of the CGST Act is **directory and not... When tax is levied without the authority of law... The Court concluded that the impugned orders, which...
Karnataka High Court2025WRIT PETITION NO. 27259

M/S Merck Life Science Private Limited vs The Union Of India on 7 November, 2025

Here is a summary of the judgment: **1. Outcome** The petitions are allowed. The impugned orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes (Respondent No.3) rejecting the refund claims are set aside. The High Court held that the refund applications/claims of the...

**Constitutional Mandate & Unjust Enrichment:**... **CBIC Circular on "Subsequently Held":**... **Admission of Facts:** The Court noted that the...
Karnataka High Court2025WRIT PETITION NO. 27259

M/S Merek Life Science Private Limited vs The Union Of India on 7 November, 2025

**M/S Merek Life Science Private Limited vs The Union Of India on 7 November, 2025** **1. Outcome** The Karnataka High Court allowed the petitions, set aside the impugned orders rejecting the refund claims on grounds of limitation, held that the refund claims were not barred...

Section 54 of the CGST Act and Rule 89(1A) are... Where tax is collected without authority of law... The department has a duty to assist taxpayers in...
Karnataka High Court2025WRIT PETITION NO. 27259

M/S Merek Life Science Private Limited vs The Union Of India on 7 November, 2025

**Judgment Summary: M/S Merek Life Science Private Limited vs The Union Of India** --- **1. Outcome** The High Court of Karnataka allowed the writ petitions. It set aside the impugned refund rejection orders passed by Respondent No. 3 and held that the petitioner's refund...

The Court highlighted Article 265 of the... Applying principles of restitution and unjust... The Court also noted that CBIC Circular No....
Karnataka High Court2025WRIT PETITION NO. 27259

M/S Merek Life Science Private Limited vs The Union Of India on 7 November, 2025

Here is a summary of the judgment: **1. Outcome** The High Court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned orders rejecting the refund applications, and held that the refund claims were not barred by limitation. The matters were remitted back to the Assistant...

Citing *Comsol Energy Private Limited v. State of... The Court found that the Central GST authorities... The Court also noted that CBIC Circular No....
Patna High Court2025No.470 of 2024

M/S Sane Retails Private Limited vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2025

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in *M/S Sane Retails Private Limited vs The State Of Bihar*. *** ### **Judgment Summary: M/S Sane Retails Private Limited & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar** --- #### **1. Outcome** The...

The CGST Act represents a departure from older tax... The Court distinguished the precedents relied upon... The Court concluded that the lower authorities had...
Patna High Court2025No.470 of 2024

M/S Shreyash Retail Private Limited vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2025

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment. *** ### Judgment Summary: M/S Shreyash Retail Private Limited vs The State Of Bihar **Case Reference:** The judgment adjudicates a batch of petitions, with the lead case being **CWJC...

The Court reasoned that the Explanation clearly... This provision in the CGST Act marks a departure... The Court found that the authorities below had...
Patna High Court2025No.470 of 2024

M/S Utkrisht Trade Solution Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2025

Of course. Here is a structured summary of the judgment as requested. *** ### **GST Judgment Summary: M/S Utkrisht Trade Solution Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar** **1. Outcome** The writ petitions were allowed. The impugned orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority...

The Court gave significant weight to the... The Court observed that the GST regime is a... The lower authorities had failed to apply their...
Patna High Court2025No.470 of 2024

M/S Utkrisht Trade Solutions Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2025

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in M/S Utkrisht Trade Solutions Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar. *** ### **Judgment Summary: M/S Utkrisht Trade Solutions Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar** **Date of Judgment:** 11 April,...

It clarified that the CGST Act does **not** mandate... The lower authorities committed an error by failing... The Court distinguished the precedents relied upon...
Madras High Court2025No.27621 of 2021

Urjita Electronics Private Limited vs The Joint Commissioner Of Gst And on 2 January, 2025

**1. Outcome** The Writ Petitions were allowed. The impugned common orders dated 27.04.2021, which rejected the refund claims, were set aside. The case was remitted back to the Assistant Commissioner for a fresh order, directing them to allow the refund claims along with...

**Revenue (Joint Commissioner of GST and Central... SEZ units benefit from a special scheme with... Supplies to SEZ are "Zero-rated" for the...
Bombay High Court2024WRIT PETITION NO. 2980

Landt Ihi Consortium vs Union Of India And 3 Ors on 14 November, 2024

Here is a summary of the judgment: 1. **Outcome** * The Court rejected the petitioner's challenge to the constitutional validity and legality of **Sections 7, 12, 13**, and **16(2)(b)** of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Maharashtra Goods...

Section 7, defining "supply" to include "agreed to... Sections 12 and 13, by making the date of receipt... Therefore, the constitutional challenge to Sections...
Delhi District Court2024no. 781113535332

M/S Greenolution Pvt Ltd vs Rhino Concretes India Pvt Ltd And Ors on 30 September, 2024

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in *M/S Greenolution Pvt Ltd vs Rhino Concretes India Pvt Ltd*. *** ### **Judgment Summary** **1. Outcome** The suit was decreed in favor of the Plaintiff (M/s Greenolution Pvt Ltd). The...

**Deemed Admission of Documents:** Consequently,... **Significance of ITC Admission:** The court... **Interest Rate Modification:** While upholding the...
Karnataka High Court2024WRIT PETITION NO.14414

M/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Central ... on 20 August, 2024

Here's a summary of the judgment M/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Central ... on 20 August, 2024, structured as requested: --- ### Judgment Summary: M/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Central ... **1....

**Interpretation of Section 54(3)(ii):** The Court... **Consistency with other High Courts:** The...
Allahabad High Court2024No. 1082 of 2022

M/S Pp Polyplast Pvt Ltd vs Additional Commissioner Grade 2 And ... on 30 July, 2024

Here is a summary of the judgment: --- **1. Outcome** The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 16.04.2024 passed by the first appellate authority and the impugned order dated 08.10.2018 passed by respondent no. 2 are hereby quashed. **2. Core Issue** The core...

The Court extensively relied on its previous... Citing `Metenere Limited`, the Court highlighted... The Court further observed from `M/s Maa Mahamaya...
Allahabad High Court2024No. 1082 of 2022

M/S Vijay Trading Company vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 And ... on 20 August, 2024

Here is a summary of the judgment: **1. Outcome** The High Court allowed the writ petition, thereby quashing the impugned order dated 03.04.2024 passed by the first appellate authority and the order dated 24.01.2023 passed by the respondent no. 2. **2. Core Issue** The core...

Referencing *Metenere Limited*, the Court... The Court further clarified, drawing from *M/s Maa... Section 130(1)(ii) is inapplicable when goods are...
Allahabad High Court2024No. 204 of 2021

M/S Vk Electricals vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 ... on 23 August, 2024

**1. Outcome** The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 26.12.2023, passed by the respondent no. 1 in Appeal No. 204 of 2021 under Section 130 read with Section 122 of the UP GST Act, is hereby quashed. **2. Core Issue** The core issue is whether proceedings...

**Referencing *Metenere Limited (supra):*** This... **Referencing *M/s Maa Mahamaya Alloys Pvt. Ltd.... Tax and penalty cannot be assessed or determined...
Allahabad High Court2024No. 1007 of 2022

S/S Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar vs Additional Commissioner Grade 2 And ... on 25 July, 2024

Here's a summary of the judgment: --- ### S/S Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar vs Additional Commissioner Grade 2 And ... on 25 July, 2024 **1. Outcome** The writ petition was allowed. The impugned order dated 24.03.2022, passed by the Additional Commissioner Grade 2 in GST...

**Metenere Limited (supra):** This judgment... **M/s Maa Mahamaya Alloys Pvt. Ltd. (supra):** This... Based on these established precedents, the Court...
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati2024No.15351 of 2023

Seil Energy India Limited vs The Union Of India on 31 July, 2024

Here's a summary of the judgment: --- ### 1. Outcome The Writ Petitions are **allowed**. The orders in appeal and the orders in original, which rejected the refund applications, are set aside. The 2nd respondent (Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax) is directed to...

**Subsequent Rejection:** After the amendment and... **Invoicing Practice:** As per the Power Purchase...
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati2024No.15351 of 2023

Seil Energy India Limited vs Union Of India on 31 July, 2024

Here's a summary of the judgment in the requested format: ### 1. Outcome The High Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the original and appellate orders of rejection. It directed the 2nd respondent (Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax) to reconsider the...

**Current Rejection:** Following the amendment, the... **Invoice Practice:** As per the power purchase...
Madras High Court2024No. 21737 of 2024

Tvl.Aanjaneya Pharmacy vs The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 19 September, 2024

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in *Tvl. Aanjaneya Pharmacy vs The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes*. *** ### **Judgment Summary** **1. Outcome** The writ petitions were disposed of. The impugned assessment orders...

The Court also deemed it fair to provide the... Balancing the interests of both parties, the Court...
Bangalore District Court2023No.73 of 2007

Bengaluru - 560 039 vs Mr. Ganesh Shet on 9 May, 2023

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in *M/s. Winsid Coatings India Pvt., Ltd., vs Mr. Ganesh Shet*. --- ### **Summary of Judgment** **1. Outcome** The Accused, Mr. Ganesh Shet, was convicted of the offence punishable under...

**On Deficient Stamp Duty:** The Court referred to... **On the GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) Argument:**... The Accused argued that the Complainant had claimed...
Punjab-Haryana High Court2023No. 16266 of 2018

M/S Bright Road Logistics vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 9 August, 2023

Here's a summary of the judgment: --- **1. Outcome** The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s Bright Road Logistics. It upheld the order of the First Appellate Authority, which had affirmed the Proper Officer's order imposing Integrated...

Since the tax and penalty demanded under Section... The Court emphasized that "intention to evade... The Court also confirmed that the petitioner was...
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur2023Writ Petition No. 8476/2021

M/S Nahar Industrial Enterprises ... vs Union Of India on 31 October, 2023

Here's a summary of the judgment: **1. Outcome** The High Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to undertake a fresh consideration of the refund...

**Adherence to Legislative Intent:** Relying... **Rejection of Revenue's Grounds:** The court found the revenue's argument of "more or...
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur2023Writ Petition No. 8476/2021

M/S Nahar Industrial Enterprises ... vs Union Of India on 31 October, 2023

Here's a summary of the judgment: **1. Outcome** The High Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the orders of the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority that rejected the petitioner's refund claims. The Adjudicating Authority has been directed to...

**Purpose of Section 54(3):** The court reiterated,... **Applicability of Circulars:** The court noted... **Computation Method:** The court affirmed that if...
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur2023Writ Petition No. 8476/2021

M/S Nahar Industrial Enterprises ... vs Union Of India on 31 October, 2023

**1. Outcome** The High Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned orders of the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration of the refund claims in light of the Court's...

**Legislative Intent (as per VKC Footsteps):** The... **Applicability of Circulars:** The Court... **Conclusion on Inversion:** The Court concluded...
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur2023Writ Petition No. 8476/2021

M/S Nahar Industrial Enterprises ... vs Union Of India on 31 October, 2023

**1. Outcome** The High Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to undertake a fresh consideration of the refund claims in light of the High...

**Circulars:** The court acknowledged that... **Computation of Refund:** The court clarified that... **Conclusion:** The court concluded that the...
Karnataka High Court2023WRIT PETITION NO. 5569

M/S Premier Sales Promotion Pvt Limited vs The Union Of India on 16 January, 2023

Here is a summary of the judgment M/S Premier Sales Promotion Pvt Limited vs The Union Of India on 16 January, 2023: --- 1. **Outcome** The Writ Petition filed by M/S Premier Sales Promotion Pvt Limited was **allowed**. The orders passed by the Karnataka Authority for...

**Petitioner's Business:** M/S Premier Sales... **Voucher Usage:** Clients then issue these... **Nature of Vouchers:** The vouchers in question...
Karnataka High Court2023WRIT PETITION NO. 13185

M/S Tonbo Imaging India Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India on 16 February, 2023

As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a summary of the judgment: **1. Outcome** The Karnataka High Court allowed the writ petition. * It declared the words "or the value which is 1.5 times the value of like goods domestically supplied by the same or, similarly placed...

**Violation of Article 14 (Equality and Arbitrariness):** **Hostile Discrimination:** The Court found the... **Arbitrariness and Unreasonableness:** The rule is...
Karnataka High Court2023WRIT PETITION No.16175

M/S Wipro Limited India vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Central ... on 6 January, 2023

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in M/S Wipro Limited India vs The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax. *** ### **Summary of Judgment: M/S Wipro Limited India vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax** #### **1....

**Justice-Oriented Approach:** Although the... **Conclusion:** Given the nature of the error and...
Madras High Court2023No.5130 of 2022

Tvl.Kalyan Jewellers India Ltd vs Union Of India on 27 November, 2023

Here is a summary of the judgment: **1. Outcome** The Madras High Court partly allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order of the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (TNSAAAR) dated 22.06.2021 (read with 30.03.2021) to the extent it was...

**AAAR Rectification (22.06.2021):** Rectified a... **RBI Master Directions:** The court noted that...
Madras High Court2023No.5130 of 2022

Tvl.Kalyan Jewellers India Ltd vs Union Of India on 27 November, 2023

As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here's a summary of the judgment: --- **1. Outcome** The Madras High Court partly allowed the writ petition. It quashed the impugned order of the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (TNSAAAR) to the extent that it...

**Interpretation of Time of Supply (Section 12(4) GST):** The Court clarified that Section 12(4)... **Section 12(4)(a):** If the "Gift Voucher/Card" is...
Allahabad High Court2022No.419 of 2022

M/S Alok Traders vs Commissioner Commercial Taxes And 2 ... on 27 April, 2022

Here's a summary of the judgment: --- **1. Outcome** The High Court allowed both writ petitions, directing the respondents to pay interest to the petitioner on the delayed refund amount of Rs. 4,70,400/- (and Rs. 5,60,000/- in the connected petition) for the period from...

**Arbitrary Withholding:** The Court found the... **Relevant Date for Interest:** Applying... **No One Can Benefit from Own Wrong:** Citing...
Madras High Court2022No.949 of 2022

M/S. Atc Tires Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner Of Gst & on 8 March, 2022

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in M/S. Atc Tires Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner Of Gst. *** ### **Judgment Summary: M/S. Atc Tires Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner Of Gst** **1. Outcome** The Writ Petition...

**Purpose of Zero-Rating:** The very purpose of... **Correct Interpretation of Rule 89(1) Proviso:**... **Absence of Double Benefit:** The supplier of the...
Madras High Court2022No.949 of 2022

M/S. Atc Tires Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner Of Gst & on 8 March, 2022

Of course. As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in *M/S. Atc Tires Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner Of Gst & on 8 March, 2022*. *** ### **1. Outcome** The Writ Petition was **allowed**. The High Court quashed the Order-in-Appeal...

The Court reasoned that the entire GST chain must... If the petitioner (the actual exporter) is also... The Court interpreted the second proviso to Rule...
Gauhati High Court2021WP(C)No.3878/2021

Bmg Informatics Pvt Ltd vs The Union Of India And 3 Ors on 2 September, 2021

Here is a summary of the judgment: --- **1. Outcome** The Guwahati High Court set aside both the order of the Assistant Commissioner (rejecting the refund claim) and the order of the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) (allowing the refund claim). The matter was remanded back to...

**Partial Exemption:** The Court determined that... **Flaws in Lower Orders:** The Assistant Commissioner's order was...
Allahabad High Court2021No.304 of 2020

M/S North End Food Marketing Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of U P And 4 Others on 31 August, 2021

As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a structured summary of the judgment in *M/S North End Food Marketing Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of U P And 4 Others*. *** ### **1. Outcome** The writ petition was **allowed**. The impugned order dated 26.03.2021, passed by the Commissioner...

. **Non-Reasoned Order:** The impugned order did... . **Drastic Nature of Rule 86A:** The Court...
Supreme Court of India2021No 4810 of 2021

Union Of India vs Vkc Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. on 13 September, 2021

As a Senior GST Legal Analyst, here is a summary of the Supreme Court judgment in *Union of India vs Vkc Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd.*: --- **1. Outcome** The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India, setting aside the judgment of the Gujarat High Court...

The Madras High Court took a contrary view, holding... The Supreme Court heard appeals against both High... Crucially, the Court noted the legislative...
Madras High Court1800No.8596 of 2019

Tvl.Transtonnelstroy Afcons Joint ... vs Union Of India

Here is a summary of the judgment from the perspective of a Senior GST Legal Analyst: **1. Outcome** The Madras High Court dismissed all writ petitions challenging: * The constitutional validity of Section 54(3)(ii) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST...

. **Meaning of "inputs":** The Court affirmed that... . **Validity of Rule 89(5):** The Court concluded... . **Nature of Refund and Article 14:** The Court...

Get AI-Powered GST Insights

Live enforcement alerts, discussion forums, AI analysis & full case law search — free.

Open TaxIntelHub