Breaking News GST 2 min read

11052026 Absence Of Pmt 03 Functionality On The GST Portal Cannot Be Used As A Ground To Deny Legitimate Re Credit Of IT

On May 10, 2026, courts affirmed that the absence of PMT-03 functionality cannot justify denying legitimate ITC claims.

The inability to utilize the PMT-03 functionality on the GST portal cannot be a valid reason to deny legitimate Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims. This issue has been addressed in several court rulings, providing relief to taxpayers facing unjust ITC denials. The core issue arises when taxpayers attempt to rectify incorrectly paid taxes through Form GST PMT-03, a function sometimes unavailable on the GST portal. Tax authorities have been known to deny ITC claims, citing discrepancies in tax payments, even when the taxpayer has attempted to correct errors. This stance has been challenged, with courts emphasizing that the absence of a functional PMT-03 cannot penalize taxpayers who have genuinely tried to comply with GST regulations. The consequence of these rulings is that tax authorities must now re-evaluate ITC claims rejected solely on the basis of PMT-03 unavailability, potentially leading to significant refunds for affected businesses.

Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 outlines the eligibility and conditions for claiming Input Tax Credit. Rule 36(4) specifies documentation requirements. Denying ITC solely due to a system malfunction like PMT-03 absence contradicts the intent of Section 16, potentially leading to legal challenges and penalties for tax authorities.

Tax authorities may attempt to conduct detailed audits to verify the genuineness of transactions where PMT-03 issues were cited. Businesses should maintain meticulous records of all transactions, payment attempts, and communications with the GST portal. A proactive approach to documentation can mitigate potential disputes and ensure compliance.

N/A
Courts ruled PMT-03 absence cannot deny legitimate ITC.
Taxpayers faced ITC denials due to PMT-03 unavailability.
Authorities must re-evaluate rejected ITC claims.

This ruling protects businesses from unjust ITC denials due to technical glitches on the GST portal, ensuring fair tax administration. It also sets a precedent against penalizing taxpayers for system-related issues.

Action Required
Businesses with previously rejected ITC claims due to PMT-03 issues should re-apply, citing these court rulings.
Is GST applicable on services provided by directors to the company?
Yes, GST is applicable on services provided by directors to the company under reverse charge mechanism as per Section 9(3) of the CGST Act, 2017. The company is liable to pay GST.
Can GST officer arrest without issuing a show cause notice?
Generally, arrest under GST is permissible only under specific circumstances, primarily involving substantial tax evasion, and typically follows the issuance of a show cause notice. Section 69 of the CGST Act requires specific reasons and authorization for arrest.

Related Articles

15 Jun 2026 · Gst

Flipkart moves Kolkata HC for GST exemption on delivery charges after appellate ruling setback

14 Jun 2026 · Gst

High Court Sets Aside GST Appellate Order for Denial of Opportunity to Reply to Show Cause Notice

13 Jun 2026 · Gst

Gold Bars Worth Over Rs 4.26 Crore Seized From Plane’s Lavatory At Ahmedabad Airport

27 May 2026 · Gst

International Road Federation seeks GST cut on helmets, ambulances, essential medical equipment

27 May 2026 · Gst

Laundry Soap Below 500 Grams Not Eligible for 5% GST Concession: West Bengal AAR

Get AI-Powered GST Insights

Live enforcement alerts, discussion forums, AI analysis & full case law search — free.

Open TaxIntelHub