Breaking News GST 3 min read

Gstat Upholds Dgap Report Against Nandi Infratech Directs 18 Interest On Profiteered Amount

The GSTAT upheld the DGAP report against Nandi Infratech, directing 18% interest on the profiteered amount.

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has upheld a report by the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) against Nandi Infratech, confirming that the company had indeed engaged in profiteering. The order directs Nandi Infratech to pay 18% interest on the amount it illegally profited from failing to pass on the benefit of reduced tax rates to its customers. This decision underscores the government's commitment to ensuring that the benefits of GST rate reductions are directly passed on to consumers, preventing businesses from unjustly enriching themselves. The case highlights the importance of transparent pricing practices and compliance with anti-profiteering measures under the GST regime. Failure to comply can lead to significant financial repercussions, including interest penalties and potential legal action. The order reinforces the need for businesses to align their pricing strategies with the underlying tax rates to avoid scrutiny and penalties.

Section 171 of the CGST Act addresses anti-profiteering measures, mandating that any reduction in tax rates or benefit of input tax credit (ITC) must be passed on to consumers by way of commensurate reduction in prices. Failure to comply with this provision can result in penalties, including the imposition of interest on the profiteered amount and potential legal action. The GSTAT's order reinforces the enforcement of this section.

This ruling highlights the increasing scrutiny on businesses to demonstrate compliance with anti-profiteering provisions. Companies should proactively conduct internal audits to ensure that pricing strategies accurately reflect GST rate changes and ITC benefits. The risk of facing DGAP investigations and subsequent penalties necessitates a robust compliance framework.

Null
GSTAT upheld DGAP report against Nandi Infratech.
Nandi Infratech directed to pay 18% interest.
Profiteering involved failure to pass on GST rate reductions.

This ruling reinforces the importance of adhering to anti-profiteering measures under GST, impacting pricing strategies for businesses. It serves as a reminder of the potential financial and legal consequences of non-compliance.

Action Required
Review pricing strategies to ensure GST rate reductions are passed on to consumers to avoid penalties.
Is GST applicable on the sale of under-construction properties?
Yes, GST is applicable on the sale of under-construction properties, but the rate varies depending on the type of property and whether the developer has opted for the new concessional rates. Section 9 of the CGST Act empowers the government to levy GST on such transactions.
Can a GST officer arrest without issuing a show cause notice?
While generally a show cause notice is required, Section 69 of the CGST Act allows for arrest under certain circumstances where there is reason to believe that a person has committed an offense punishable under Section 132, such as tax evasion, fraud, or obstruction of officers, and the prescribed tax amount exceeds a specified limit.

Related Articles

27 May 2026 · Gst

International Road Federation seeks GST cut on helmets, ambulances, essential medical equipment

27 May 2026 · Gst

Laundry Soap Below 500 Grams Not Eligible for 5% GST Concession: West Bengal AAR

27 May 2026 · Gst

Advance Ruling Application Dismissed as ITC Dispute was Already Pending Before Enforcement Authorities

27 May 2026 · Gst

HC Directs GST Authorities to Reconsider GST Revocation Application Subject to Tax Dues Payment

26 May 2026 · Gst

Can lawyer be jailed for his client’s case? Allahabad High Court drops major warning over FIR against GST advocate - The Indian Express

Get AI-Powered GST Insights

Live enforcement alerts, discussion forums, AI analysis & full case law search — free.

Open TaxIntelHub